home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.ndh.com!news
- From: m.jantz@public.ndh.com (Marcel Jantz)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Subject: Re: CyberGraphX memory (Was: Haynie joins AT team)
- Date: 30 Mar 1996 14:02:54 GMT
- Organization: ndh - Netzwerkdienste Hoeger
- Message-ID: <697.6662T1387T96@public.ndh.com>
- References: <d92-jfo-2903961351230001@karmosin-13.nada.kth.se>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: slip-141.ndh.com
- X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP) *UNREGISTERED*
-
- >In article <4jamk8$dbs@daily-planet.execpc.com>, innuendo@mail.execpc.com
- >(Jonathan Gapen) wrote:
-
-
- >In a way, CGFX *is* flawed. Granted, a 800*600 screen will use up over a meg,
- >but that's what *video memory* (on the card) is for! Why should we have to
- >use 1 meg of video ram, *and* one meg of fast ram?
- >(Why do we? I suppose it has to do with planar emulation for non-cgfx
- >programs)
-
- >Johan Forsberg
-
- No, it has to do with not using the videoram w/o buffering the screen before
- it's really neccessary. One can do this.
-
- ___________________________________________________________
-
- "Nevertheless smart people still need to eat and pay rent."
-
- Marcel Jantz (McMaJa)
- Techn. Support ProDev
-
-
-
-
-